Ukr.Biochem.J. 2024; Volume 96, Issue 2, Mar-Apr, pp. 12-18

doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj96.02.012

Scientific integrity in biomedical research is a global problem

S. Paryzhak1,2, S. G. Vari3*

1Department of Medical Biology, Parasitology and Genetics,
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine;
2Loyola University Chicago, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics & Health Policy, USA;
3International Research and Innovation in Medicine Program,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA;
*e-mail: vari@cshs.org

Received: 02 February 2024; Revised: 11 March 2024;
Accepted: 25 March 2024; Available on-line: 30 April 2024

Science contributes to globalization by creating new knowledge and technologies that can be shared and applied across different regions and cultures. The Regional Cooperation for Health, Science and Technology (RECOOP HST) Association combines the scientific output of partner organizations at the local and regional levels and uses it at the global level to prevent and eliminate major public health problems. Since research integrity (RI) varies among participating research organizations from the U.S.A. to Ukraine, RECOOP HST recognizes that high-quality research and outcomes, as measured by published papers, require a common understanding of scientific integrity and bioethics. During the last 15 years, RECOOP HST has organized workshops to educate scientists about the most devastating forms of research dishonesty: fabrication, falsification or plagiarism, which destroy trust and respect among scientists. Different types of research misconduct require different methods of detection and investigation. Now, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), various plagiarism-checking software has appeared. However, detecting fabrication and falsification is not so easy. In addition, AI should not be used to replace human reviewers, as there is currently insufficient evidence to support AI application in peer review. Two main approaches that RECOOP HST has taken to prevent misconduct and promote RI are evidence-based education and mentoring of students. Mentoring should take the form of informal discussions with students about responsible conduct of research and serving as a role model. Key strategies for promoting integrity include the development of institutional policies and the monitoring of activities with appropriate auditing of data.

Keywords: , , ,


References:

  1. Vari SG. Key elements of networking in life sciences: collective creative thinking and team work. Croat Med J. 2015;56(2):75-77. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  2. Gui Q, Liu C, Du D. Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum. 2019;105:1-12. CrossRef
  3. Puljak L, Vari SG. Significance of research networking for enhancing collaboration and research productivity. Croat Med J. 2014;55(3):181-183. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  4. Stoeklé HC, Ivasilevitch A, Hervé C. Good practice in medicine and biology: scientific integrity needs global bioethics. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):37. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  5. Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5738. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  6. International Center for Academic Integrity. Facts and Statistic. Available from: https://academicintegrity.org/resources/facts-and-statistics
  7. Bouter L. Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved. Account Res. 2023:1-10. PubMed, CrossRef
  8. Melmed S, Vari SG. Challenges in life sciences and health systems in the 21st century. Croat Med J. 2014;55(3):184-185. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  9. The Office of Integrity Research. About ORI. Available from: https://ori.hhs.gov/about-ori
  10. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. About ICMJE. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/
  11. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine “On Education” No.2145-VIII,” 2017. Available online at https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/law-education
  12. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine “On Higher Education” No.1556-VII,” 2014. Available online at https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/files/ENG/2020/la.pdf
  13. The Office of Research Integrity. Definition of Research Misconduct. Available online at https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-research-misconduct
  14. North RA. Plagiarism Reimagined. Function (Oxf). 2023;4(3):zqad014. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  15. Bhati A, Kumar H. Research Ethics and Plagiarism in Today’s World. J Res Sch Prof English Lang Teach. 2023;7(36). CrossRef
  16. Rennie D. Integrity in scientific publishing. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(3):885-896. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  17. Mehra MR, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10240):1820. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  18. Kousha K, Thelwall M. Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learn Publ. 2024; 37(1): 4-12. CrossRef
  19. Liao M, Tan S, Baig MB. Plagiarism Detection Using Human-in-the-Loop AI. In Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. 2023. Available from: https://englishtest-static.duolingo.cn/media/resources/ncme_23_liao.pdf
  20. Steponenaite A, Barakat B. Plagiarism in AI Empowered World. In Antona M, Stephanidis C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14021. Springer, Cham. pp. 434-442. CrossRef
  21. Elali FR, Rachid LN. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns (N Y). 2023;4(3):100706.
    PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  22. Ibrahim K. Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”. Lang Test Asia. 2023;13(1): 46. CrossRef
  23. Lee G, Kim J, Choi M, Jang RY, Lee R. Review of Code Similarity and Plagiarism Detection Research Studies. Appl Sci. 2023;13(20):11358. CrossRef
  24. van den Hoven M, Lindemann T, Zollitsch L, Prieß-Buchheit J. A Taxonomy for Research Intergrity Training: Design, Conduct, and Improvements in Research Integrity Courses. Sci Eng Ethics. 2023;29(3):14. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  25. Labib K, Tijdink J, Sijtsma K, Bouter L, Evans N, Widdershoven G. How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity? Account Res. 2023:1-27. PubMed, CrossRef
  26. Van Noorden R. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 – a new record. Nature. 2023;624(7992):479-481. PubMed, CrossRef
  27. Xu SB, Hu G. A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction. Account Res. 2022;29(8):512-536. PubMed, CrossRef
  28. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Updated January 2024. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.