Ukr.Biochem.J. 2024; Volume 96, Issue 2, Mar-Apr, pp. 12-18
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj96.02.012
Scientific integrity in biomedical research is a global problem
S. Paryzhak1,2, S. G. Vari3*
1Department of Medical Biology, Parasitology and Genetics,
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine;
2Loyola University Chicago, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics & Health Policy, USA;
3International Research and Innovation in Medicine Program,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA;
*e-mail: vari@cshs.org
Received: 02 February 2024; Revised: 11 March 2024;
Accepted: 25 March 2024; Available on-line: 30 April 2024
Science contributes to globalization by creating new knowledge and technologies that can be shared and applied across different regions and cultures. The Regional Cooperation for Health, Science and Technology (RECOOP HST) Association combines the scientific output of partner organizations at the local and regional levels and uses it at the global level to prevent and eliminate major public health problems. Since research integrity (RI) varies among participating research organizations from the U.S.A. to Ukraine, RECOOP HST recognizes that high-quality research and outcomes, as measured by published papers, require a common understanding of scientific integrity and bioethics. During the last 15 years, RECOOP HST has organized workshops to educate scientists about the most devastating forms of research dishonesty: fabrication, falsification or plagiarism, which destroy trust and respect among scientists. Different types of research misconduct require different methods of detection and investigation. Now, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), various plagiarism-checking software has appeared. However, detecting fabrication and falsification is not so easy. In addition, AI should not be used to replace human reviewers, as there is currently insufficient evidence to support AI application in peer review. Two main approaches that RECOOP HST has taken to prevent misconduct and promote RI are evidence-based education and mentoring of students. Mentoring should take the form of informal discussions with students about responsible conduct of research and serving as a role model. Key strategies for promoting integrity include the development of institutional policies and the monitoring of activities with appropriate auditing of data.
Keywords: fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, scientific and research integrity
References:
- Vari SG. Key elements of networking in life sciences: collective creative thinking and team work. Croat Med J. 2015;56(2):75-77. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Gui Q, Liu C, Du D. Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum. 2019;105:1-12. CrossRef
- Puljak L, Vari SG. Significance of research networking for enhancing collaboration and research productivity. Croat Med J. 2014;55(3):181-183. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Stoeklé HC, Ivasilevitch A, Hervé C. Good practice in medicine and biology: scientific integrity needs global bioethics. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):37. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5738. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- International Center for Academic Integrity. Facts and Statistic. Available from: https://academicintegrity.org/resources/facts-and-statistics
- Bouter L. Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved. Account Res. 2023:1-10. PubMed, CrossRef
- Melmed S, Vari SG. Challenges in life sciences and health systems in the 21st century. Croat Med J. 2014;55(3):184-185. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- The Office of Integrity Research. About ORI. Available from: https://ori.hhs.gov/about-ori
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. About ICMJE. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine “On Education” No.2145-VIII,” 2017. Available online at https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/law-education
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine “On Higher Education” No.1556-VII,” 2014. Available online at https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/files/ENG/2020/la.pdf
- The Office of Research Integrity. Definition of Research Misconduct. Available online at https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-research-misconduct
- North RA. Plagiarism Reimagined. Function (Oxf). 2023;4(3):zqad014. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Bhati A, Kumar H. Research Ethics and Plagiarism in Today’s World. J Res Sch Prof English Lang Teach. 2023;7(36). CrossRef
- Rennie D. Integrity in scientific publishing. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(3):885-896. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Mehra MR, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10240):1820. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Kousha K, Thelwall M. Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learn Publ. 2024; 37(1): 4-12. CrossRef
- Liao M, Tan S, Baig MB. Plagiarism Detection Using Human-in-the-Loop AI. In Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. 2023. Available from: https://englishtest-static.duolingo.cn/media/resources/ncme_23_liao.pdf
- Steponenaite A, Barakat B. Plagiarism in AI Empowered World. In Antona M, Stephanidis C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14021. Springer, Cham. pp. 434-442. CrossRef
- Elali FR, Rachid LN. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns (N Y). 2023;4(3):100706.
PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef - Ibrahim K. Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”. Lang Test Asia. 2023;13(1): 46. CrossRef
- Lee G, Kim J, Choi M, Jang RY, Lee R. Review of Code Similarity and Plagiarism Detection Research Studies. Appl Sci. 2023;13(20):11358. CrossRef
- van den Hoven M, Lindemann T, Zollitsch L, Prieß-Buchheit J. A Taxonomy for Research Intergrity Training: Design, Conduct, and Improvements in Research Integrity Courses. Sci Eng Ethics. 2023;29(3):14. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
- Labib K, Tijdink J, Sijtsma K, Bouter L, Evans N, Widdershoven G. How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity? Account Res. 2023:1-27. PubMed, CrossRef
- Van Noorden R. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 – a new record. Nature. 2023;624(7992):479-481. PubMed, CrossRef
- Xu SB, Hu G. A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction. Account Res. 2022;29(8):512-536. PubMed, CrossRef
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Updated January 2024. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
