Ukr.Biochem.J. 2020; Volume 92, Issue 5, Sep-Oct, pp. 41-49

doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj92.05.041

Cryoprotective agents affect amino acids incorporation into total proteins in cells of lymphoid organs and liver of experimental animals

A. K. Gulevskyy*, Yu. S. Akhatova, A. Yu. Nikolchenko

Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine,
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv;
*e-mail: profgulevskyy@gmail.com

Received: 07 July 2019; Accepted: 25 June 2020

The effect of penetrating (glycerol, DMSO) and poorly penetrating (PEG-400) cryoprotective agents on labeled amino acids incorporation into de novo synthesized proteins in the cells of mice thymus, lymph nodes, spleen and cell-free rat liver extract was studied. Cryoprotective agents within the range of concentrations which provide a cryoprotective effect were found to inhibit significantly protein synthesis in cell-free systems under investigation. The most effective inhibition was exerted by polymeric cryoprotective agent PEG-400. Cryoprotective agents more efficiently  inhibited protein synthesis at a cell level as compared with that in cell-free system that was likely associated with their effect on amino acids transport system. An inhibitory effect of cryoprotective agents on the protein synthesizing apparatus of cells was determined to be Mg2+-dependent and reversible.

Keywords: , , , , ,


References:

  1. Best BP. Cryoprotectant toxicity: facts, issues, and questions. Rejuvenation Res. 2015;18(5):422-436.   PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  2. Elliott GD, Wang S, Fuller BJ. Cryoprotectants: A review of the actions and applications of cryoprotective solutes that modulate cell recovery from ultra-low temperatures. Cryobiology. 2017;76:74-91. PubMed, CrossRef
  3. Baust JG, Baust JM, Shnayder K, Van Bascirk R. Biopreservation – molecular-based mitigation of the preservation challenges. Probl Cryobiol. 2008; 18(2): 163. (In Russian).
  4. Gulevsky AK, Lavrik AA, Trifonova AV. The Influence of DMSO and a fraction (below 5 Kda) from cord blood on MSC culture growth. Bull Probl Biol Med. 2014;3(112):96-99. (In Russian).
  5. Dyubko TS. Interaction of cryoprotectants with model membranes with high cholesterol content.  Probl Cryobiol. 2006;16(3):271-285. (In Russian).
  6. Nardid OA. Study of low-molecular effect of cryoprotectants on mitochondria respiratory chain by spin probe EPR. Probl Cryobiol. 2009; 19(2):177-185. (In Russian).
  7. de Ménorval MA, Mir LM, Fernández ML, Reigada R. Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in cholesterol-containing lipid membranes: a comparative study of experiments in silico and with cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41733. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  8. Verheijen M, Lienhard  M, Schrooders Y, Clayton O, Nudischer R, Boerno S, Timmermann B, Selevsek N, Schlapbach R, Gmuender H, Gotta S, Geraedts J, Herwig R, Kleinjans J, Caiment F. DMSO induces drastic changes in human cellular processes and epigenetic landscape in vitro. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4641. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  9. Kang MH, Das J, Gurunathan S, Park HW , Song H, Park C, Kim JH.  The cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in mouse preimplantation embryos: a mechanistic study. Theranostics. 2017;7(19):4735-4752. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  10. Zhou D, Shen X, Gu Y, Zhang N, Li T, Wu X, Lei L. Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide on asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. BMC Dev Biol. 2014;14:28. PubMed, PubMedCentral, CrossRef
  11.  Gulevsky AK, Grischenkova EA. Structural and functional changes in the transport system of glycine in the cryopreservation process. / Proc. of scientific papers “Biochemical aspects of cryogenic damage and cryoprotection of adhesive systems”, Kharkov. 1989: 38-41. (In Russian).
  12. Gulevsky AK, Nikolchenko AYu. The influence of the penetrating cryoprotectors on protein synthesis in the cell-free system of the rat liver. Ukr Biokhim Zhurn. 2012;84(5):68-75. (In Russian).    PubMed
  13. Umbreit VV, Burris RKh, Shtrauffur J. Manometric methods for studying tissue metabolism. Moscow: Foreign. lit. 1951. 153 с. (In Russian).
  14. Belous AM, Gryshchenko VI. Cryobiology. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1994. 431 p. (In Russian).
  15. Roush RF, Nolan EM, Löhr F, Walsh CT. Maturation of an Escherichia coli ribosomal peptide antibiotic by ATP-consuming N-P bond formation in microcin C7. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(11):3603-3609.  PubMed, CrossRef
  16. Ben-Shem A, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic ribosome. Science. 2010;330(6008):1203-1209.  PubMed, CrossRef
  17. Spirin AS. Molecular biology. Ribosomes and protein biosynthesis. M.: Akademiya, 2011. 496 p.  (In Russian).
  18. Petermann ML, Pavlovec A, Hamilton MG. Effects of agents that influence hydrogen bonding on the structure of rat liver ribosomes. Biochemistry. 1972;11(21):3925-3933.  PubMed, CrossRef
  19. Spirin AS. The structure of the ribosome and protein biosynthesis. Pushchino: Sci. center biol. researches of USSR Academy of Sciences, 1984. 367 p. (In Russian).
  20. Venkataramanan NS, Suvitha A, Kawazoe Y. Intermolecular interaction in nucleobases and dimethyl sulfoxide/water molecules: A DFT, NBO, AIM and NCI analysis. J Mol Graph Model. 2017;78:48-60. PubMed, CrossRef
  21. Yang B, Cao X, Wang C, Wang S, Sun C. Investigation of hydrogen bonding in Water/DMSO binary mixtures by Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 20205;228:117704.  PubMed, CrossRef
  22. Titova AG, Zaychikov AM. Hydrogen bonds in complexes of ethylene glycol, monoethanolamine and ethylene diamide with water. J Phys Chem. 2017;(2):114-118.
  23. Daschakraborty S. How do glycerol and dimethyl sulphoxide affect local tetrahedral structure of water around a nonpolar solute at low temperature? Importance of preferential interaction. J Chem Phys. 2018;148(13):134501.  PubMed, CrossRef

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.